GMAT考試由四部分構成，分別是：綜合推理(IR)、分析性寫作(AWA)，數學(Quantitative)和語文(Verbal)。其中，數學和語文這兩個部分是GMAT考試的主體，時間占用相對較長，采用自適應形式，較后會匯總成一個總分，是800分。分析性寫作和綜合推理這兩個部分時間占用相對較短，這兩個部分不是自適應的，分別單獨計分，綜合推理的是8分，分析性寫作的是6分。下面來看：鄭州GMAT考試輔導機構地址在哪?

新通教育創立于1996年，以“提升中國學子全球競爭力”為使命，旗下有新通留學、新通考培、新通游學、新通移民、小麥藝術、初本幼園等業務板塊。

GMAT作文模板句型

GMAT寫作中很多同學苦惱于自己缺乏寫作素材能力方面的積累，寫不出來作文，下面啟德考培老師為大家帶來，希望可以幫助到大家。

1.In this argument the arguer recommends that------

2. This recommendation is based on the result of survey that-------

3. In addition , the arguer assumes that ---------

4. A careful examation would reveal how groundless the conclusion is-----

B 5.in this analysis, the arguer claims that -----

6. to substantiate it the conclusion the arguer provides the evidence that-----

7. besides the arguer asserts that--------

8. this argument is unconvincing for several critical flaw----

9. the arguer predicts that-------

10. this prediction relies on the observation that---------

11. At the same time, the arguer reasons that----------

12. This argument is problematic for several reasons-------

13. The conclusion in this argument is that in support of this conclusion the arguer

Supplies the evidence that-------further more, the arguer infers that------

14. While this argument has some merit(s),there are several logic flaws that deserve our attention

15. The validity(credibility) of the survey is doubtful(questionable)

16. The arguer fail to convince us that

17. Granted that-----------

姑且承認--

18. We can’t ensure that-----

19. The arguer unfairly assumes that-----

20 The arguer fails to take into account other factors that might lead to(result in/contribute to/exxplain/account for/be responsible for) ----- 　21. The fact that indicates nothing about(does not imply that/does not ensure that)

22. The statistical evidence cited in the argument is so vague that it does not validate the arguer’s assumption(that----)

23. The survey on which the argument relies lacks credibility and therefore does not lend strong support to the conclusion

24, The arguer commits a fallacy of ----------